The WACko/Highgate Hub Connection

In an open letter to Indymedia, We Are Change recently denied being associated with the “911 Inside Job” crowd. Indymedia hid the letter which prevents it from being found in search engines. However, take a look at this image.

The original can be found here
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=11131

As you can see we have only altered the image slightly for comedic value. That really is members of We Are Change holding a “September 11th was a Scam!!” banner with the groups web site address.

The open letter which claims the WACkos have never made bold statements about what happened on 911 also fails to mention that at least four WACkos are committee members of the 911 “Truth” Campaign. Obtaining the complete list of all committee members wasn’t easy, but we did it.

The WACkos who sit on the 911 “Truth” Campaign committee are; Dean Puckett, Andy Baker, Toseef Fayaz and Stefan S.

And it seems the 911 “Truth” Campaign is breaking its own rules for the WACkos. According to the 911 “Truth” Campaign rules each regional group has 1 representative on the committee. All four of these WACkos live in London. Hmm.

The Highgate Hub Connection

Ian Neal, Noel Glynn, Annie Machon and Belinda McKenzie also appear on the list and also happen to live in London. This brings our total of 911 “Truth” Campaign committee members living in London to 8, at least.

Some Truthers have realised what is going on but those who publicly question the motives of Annie Machon, their leader, are expelled not only from the Highgate Hub but from the entire “Truth” Movement.

During email correspondence with the Highgate Hub an ex-truther – who will remain anonymous, once proposed “a new policy of greater disclosure in this London 911 Truth Group. The antidote to infiltrators is not more secrecy, but more honesty and openness.

“Nearly every significant person in the entire UK 911 Truth Movement has passed through one central hub in Highgate at one time or another – The home of Belinda, Annie and David (previously).

“And now there is a lot of U.S. traffic passing through too. This raises a red flag for me. Not to point fingers, but NO-ONE should be above suspicion. The events don’t really make money, yet there are always funds when it comes to wooing significant major players on the 911 scene.”

Speaking about some of the tactics used to control communications (those looking at MWH might want to take note), Anonymous said “I watched while one by one people were eliminated from lists, etc. You have to practically fight or beg if you want to stay on a list. I hear this all the time. It looks to me like all the dividing and conquering has already been done.”

In the emails Anonymous mentions Machon consistently used the term “general consensus” to get her own way, implying the majority of campaigners supported her ideas. But Machon repeatedly failed to provide names or any evidence to support these claims.

It’s not the first time she has been caught fibbing http://www.911cultwatch.org.uk/911cult_006.htm and as usual Machon still refuses to provide answers to this day.

Oh and the response from Highgate Hub?

“You are talking shite and wasting our time”

A “Truth” movement lead by liars, what else needs to be said?

OK maybe this from Anonymous “The irony is, there is all this talk about the NWO, the elite, the secret society, George Bush, the Neo-cons etc. And no one has noticed the obvious parallels. The group is not flat, nor is it inclusive. There is a lot of secrecy. There are a privileged few. There is an elite. They do sometimes meet in secret. There is centralised control. The workers are kept too busy to think. There is no time for dissent. The task at hand is all important.”

Highgate Hub /We Are Change/London 911 “Truth”/Make Wars History, whatever it’s calling itself this week, should think twice before it attempts to mislead the public again. We’ll be watching.

Disclaimer: The identity of ‘Anonymous’ will never be revealed by Truth Watch UK as we obtained these emails via a third party. We will not publish these emails in their entirety without consent and will remove all quotes from ‘Anonymous’ on request.